On July 28, 1942, U.S. Patent No. 2,291,158 issued to Axel Harald Holstensson and Svante Philip Arvidius on a Talking Machine for Playing a Plurality of Records in Succession:
Today, some might be confused by the phrase “Talking Machine” machine in the title, but that was a common name for the phonograph invented by Edison in 1877. Early on its principal use was for dictation, and not for recording and replaying music, although that obviously changed over the years.
On November 4, 1954, (twelve years into the 17-year patent term) Holstensson sued V-M Corporation, a manufacturer of record players, for infringement of the ‘158 patent. V-M denied infringement and charged that the patent was invalid. The District Judge held the patent was valid and infringed by V-M. The proceedings were still on-going when the patent expired on July 28, 1959, so the relieft sought was limited to the damages allegedly suffered prior to the patent’s expiration. VM appealed, and more than nine years after suit was filed, and more than four years after the patent expired, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Holstensson patent “is without validity as a combination patent and is likewise void for overclaiming.” Holstensson v. V-M Corporation, 325 F.2d 109 (6th Cir. 1963). At least in this case the wheels of justice appeared to turn slower than a record player.



































