{"id":1996,"date":"2018-02-20T21:01:40","date_gmt":"2018-02-21T02:01:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/?p=1996"},"modified":"2018-03-25T22:18:44","modified_gmt":"2018-03-26T02:18:44","slug":"even-under-a-narrower-construction-because-of-disclaimer-the-board-was-correct-that-the-claims-were-obvious","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/?p=1996","title":{"rendered":"Even Under a Narrower Construction Because of Disclaimer; The Board was Correct that the Claims were Obvious"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cafc.uscourts.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/opinions-orders\/16-1249.Opinion.2-16-2018.1.PDF\">Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google LLC<\/a>, [2016-1249] (February 20, 2018), affirmed the PTAB&#8217;s determination that all of the claims of U.S. Patent No.\u00a06,323,853 were obvious.\u00a0 The PTAB presented two alternative claim construction, one rejecting prosecution disclaimer and one adopting prosecution history disclaimer.<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Circuit held that the construction rejecting prosecution disclaimer was incorrect, but found the alternative construction based upon prosecution disclaimer correct. The Federal Circuit noted that\u00a0applicant amended the claims and explained\u00a0what was changed and why, and the examiner confirmed\u00a0the reasons why the amended claims were deemed allowable.\u00a0 However, even under this narrow construction, the Federal Circuit agreed with the PTAB that the claims were unpatentable for obviousness.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google LLC, [2016-1249] (February 20, 2018), affirmed the PTAB&#8217;s determination that all of the claims of U.S. Patent No.\u00a06,323,853 were obvious.\u00a0 The PTAB presented two alternative claim construction, one rejecting prosecution disclaimer and one adopting prosecution &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/?p=1996\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[69,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-disclaimer","category-obviousness"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1996"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1996\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1997,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1996\/revisions\/1997"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}