{"id":1307,"date":"2016-12-05T19:38:42","date_gmt":"2016-12-06T00:38:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/?p=1307"},"modified":"2016-12-05T19:39:16","modified_gmt":"2016-12-06T00:39:16","slug":"double-checking-the-ptab","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/?p=1307","title":{"rendered":"Double-Checking the PTAB"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Circuit&#8217;s docket is burgeoning with Patent Office appeals. \u00a0Three years ago there were 118 appeals from the USPTO pending before the Federal Circuit, today there are 578. \u00a0The bulk of this increase is due to appeals from the post grant procedures created by the AIA.<\/p>\n<p>According to a recent post on the AIPLA <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexology.com\/library\/detail.aspx?g=523c142b-f1d4-45cb-a205-dd9744b8789a&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+General+section&amp;utm_campaign=AIPLA+2013+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2016-11-22&amp;utm_term=\">website<\/a>\u00a0the Federal Circuit has decided 128 appeals of IPRs and CBMRs. \u00a07 (5%) of these were dismissed, 101 (79%) of these were complete affirmances. \u00a0In only 20 (21%) of these did the Federal Circuit reverse any aspect of the Board&#8217;s decision.<\/p>\n<p>The PTAB, at least according to the Federal Circuit, seems to be getting it right.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Circuit&#8217;s docket is burgeoning with Patent Office appeals. \u00a0Three years ago there were 118 appeals from the USPTO pending before the Federal Circuit, today there are 578. \u00a0The bulk of this increase is due to appeals from the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/?p=1307\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-inter-partes-review","category-ipr"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1307"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1307\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1326,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1307\/revisions\/1326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/patents.harnessip.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}